After Gyanvapi Case Order, Asaduddin Owaisi Says “We Will be Back to ’80s”

Asaduddin Owaisi stated the Varanasi courtroom’s order will “set off many things”.


Asaduddin Owaisi, the chief of AIMIM (All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Muslimeen) as we speak stated the order of the Varanasi courtroom permitting a petition from some Hindu girls for year-long worship within the premises of Varanasi’s Gyanvapi mosque ought to be challenged within the High Court. “I was hoping that the court will nip these issues in the bud. Now it appears that more such litigations will be coming and this is going the way the Babri Masjid legal issue went,” he advised NDTV in an unique interview hours after the decision.

The courtroom of District choose AK Vishvesha ordered as we speak {that a} petition of 5 Hindu girls looking for permission to conduct rituals contained in the mosque premises by the 12 months, will be heard. The courtroom additionally made it clear that plaintiffs weren’t asking for a conversion of the premises and their go well with “is limited and confined to the right of worship as a civil right, fundamental right as well as customary and religious right”.

The rivalry of the Muslim petitioners that it could lead to instability, has no benefit, stated the choose, who was specifically handed the case by the Supreme Court earlier this 12 months.  

The high courtroom had stated given the “complexity and sensitivity” of the dispute, it requires skilled dealing with.

Mr Owaisi, nonetheless, stated the order will “set off many things”.  

“Everyone will say that we have been here before 15 August 1947. Then the aim of the 1991 Places of Religious Worship Act will be defeated. The 1991 Act was made so that such conflicts end. But after today’s order, it seems there will be more litigations on this issue and we will be back to the ’80s and it will create a destabilising effect,” Mr Owaisi advised NDTV.   

The Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991 maintains the spiritual standing of anyplace of worship ought to keep the way in which it was on August 15, 1947. Section 3 of the Act bars the conversion of locations of worship. The Babri Masjid case was the exception.  

But following the Supreme Court order permitting a temple within the disputed space in Ayodhya and giving Muslims a separate land for a mosque, a petition has been filed difficult the Constitutional validity of sure sections of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act 1991.

The petition has argued that the regulation takes away the rights of Hindus, Jains, Buddhists, and Sikhs to restore their “places of worship and pilgrimages” destroyed by invaders.

The Jamiat Ulama-i-Hind has additionally filed a plea contending that entertaining such petitions will open floodgates of litigation in opposition to numerous mosques throughout India.

The Supreme Court will hear the matter on October 11.

A case is already being heard in Uttar Pradesh on the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Masjid Idgah dispute.   

Several petitions have been filed in Mathura courts, looking for the shifting of the mosque. The petitioners declare that it has been constructed on the birthplace of Lord Krishna, throughout the 13.37-acre premises of the Katra Keshav Dev temple.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.