“Age Won’t Help”: Ex-Cop Must Be Punished For 1984 Riots, Says Court


Court requested authority to go a punishment order in opposition to a cop charged with misconduct throughout 1984 Riots.

New Delhi:

Observing the “nation was still bleeding” years after the anti-Sikh riots of 1984, the Delhi High Court on Monday granted liberty to the competent authority to situation an “appropriate order of punishment” to a retired metropolis police officer who allegedly did not deploy enough pressure, make preventive detentions and take motion to interrupt up mobs in the course of the violence.

The bench headed by Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma, whereas setting apart the orders handed by the disciplinary authority and the Central Administrative Tribunal in opposition to the then station home officer of Kingsway Camp police station, mentioned harmless lives had been misplaced within the riots and the police officer “cannot get away” on account of his superior age of 79 years.

“He may be 100 (years old). Kindly see the misconduct. Innocent people lost their lives. The nation is still bleeding. On that ground, you cannot get away. Age will not help,” mentioned the bench, additionally comprising Justice Subramonium Prasad.

The disciplinary authority, with out recommending any punitive motion, held him responsible of misconduct in the course of the anti-Sikh riots.

He had challenged that order earlier than the CAT which was rejected, after which he moved to the excessive court docket in enchantment.

The petitioner assailed the orders earlier than the excessive court docket on the bottom that he was solely granted a “post-decisional hearing” within the matter. Post-decisional listening to is a listening to by the adjudicating authority subsequent to having decided or selection.

Setting apart the orders, the court docket mentioned that the fees in opposition to the petitioner had been critical and granted liberty to the disciplinary authority to situation a “fresh note of disagreement” and requested the petitioner to answer it inside 4 weeks.

“Thereafter the disciplinary authority will be free to pass an appropriate order in accordance with the law. The petitioner has obtained the age of superannuation and therefore the competent authority shall be free to pass appropriate order of punishment keeping in view the date of retirement and pension rules,” the court docket mentioned.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV employees and is revealed from a syndicated feed.)



Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.