Key Decision On Gyanvapi Mosque Case In Varanasi Today: 10 Facts

Gyanvapi mosque is situated subsequent to the well-known Kashi Viswanath temple in Varanasi. (File)

The courtroom of Varanasi’s seniormost choose is predicted to resolve at present whether or not a case filed by 5 Hindu ladies in search of the proper to worship inside town’s Gyanvapi mosque, situated subsequent to the well-known Kashi Viswanath temple, is “maintainable” or not.

Here are 10 info from this large story

  1. District choose AK Vishvesha is more likely to pronounce orders on whether or not the case by the ladies — that led to a survey contained in the Gyanvapi mosque — will proceed to be heard or whether or not it would stop to have any authorized standing.

  2. In May, the Supreme Court assigned the case to the Varanasi district choose’s courtroom, shifting it from a decrease courtroom the place it was being heard until then.

  3. The Supreme Court had ordered: “Keeping the complexity and sensitivity of the matter in view, the civil suit before the civil judge in Varanasi shall be heard before a senior and experienced judicial officer of the UP judicial service.”

  4. A month earlier than the Supreme Court’s intervention within the case, the Varanasi civil courtroom had ordered the filming of the Gyanvapi mosque, based mostly on the petition by the Hindu ladies who declare there are idols of Hindu Gods and goddesses within the Gyanvapi mosque advanced

  5. A report of the filming on the mosque was then submitted to the Varanasi courtroom in a sealed cowl, however the Hindu petitioners controversially launched particulars simply hours later.

  6. The report claimed a “Shivling” had been present in a pond inside the mosque advanced used for “Wazoo” or purification rituals earlier than Muslim prayers. The choose listening to the case on the time had ordered the sealing of this pond.

  7. This filming contained in the centuries-old mosque was challenged in Supreme Court by the Gyanvapi mosque committee.

  8. The petitioners stated the filming goes in opposition to the Places of Worship Act of 1991, which maintains the non secular standing of anywhere of worship as of August 15, 1947.

  9. “Such petitions and sealing of mosques will lead to public mischief and communal disharmony, will affect mosques across the country,” the mosque committee had argued.

  10. The mosque committee made comparable arguments earlier than the Varanasi district choose’s courtroom within the “maintainability” case, whereas attorneys for the Hindu petitioners claimed the regulation doesn’t bar their case and that they might set up in courtroom that the mosque premises have been really a temple as on the day of Independence.

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.