Supreme Court Gives More Time To Woman In Alleged Rape Case Against BJP Leader

A magisterial courtroom in 2018 ordered the registration of an FIR in opposition to Shahnawaz Hussain. (File)

New Delhi:

The Supreme Court in the present day granted per week’s time to a girl, who has lodged a rape criticism in opposition to BJP chief and former union minister Shahnawaz Hussain, to carry on report sure “material” paperwork.

A bench comprising Chief Justice Uday Umesh Lalit and Justice S Ravindra Bhat took notice of the submissions of the counsel for the complainant girl that some “material facts” referring to the alleged offence have been hid by the counsel for the BJP chief and he wished to carry that on prime courtroom’s report.

“If you wish to file something, please file them in a week. We will list the matter on October 12 for hearing,” the bench advised lawyer Sandeep Kumar Singh, showing for the girl.

Senior legal professionals Mukul Rohatgi and Siddharth Luthra appeared on behalf of Shahnawaz Hussain, until just lately a minister within the Bihar authorities.

Earlier, the highest courtroom had on September 19 deferred the listening to on the attraction of Shahnawaz Hussain in opposition to a Delhi High Court order referring to an FIR in opposition to him on the girl’s criticism alleging rape. The SC bench had on August 22 stayed the operation of the excessive courtroom order.

Prior to this, the excessive courtroom had on August 17 dismissed Shahnawaz Hussain’s plea difficult a trial courtroom order directing the Delhi Police to register an FIR in opposition to him, saying there was no perversity within the 2018 order, and vacated its earlier interim order staying the operation.

The prime courtroom, whereas issuing notices to Delhi police and the complainant girl on the plea of the chief, had noticed that after listening to the submissions of Mukul Rohatgi, it was of the prima facie view that this matter required consideration.

The bench had then mentioned that pending additional consideration, the impact and operation of the order beneath problem earlier than it shall stay stayed.

In 2018, a Delhi-based girl had approached a decrease courtroom in search of registration of an FIR in opposition to Shahnawaz Hussain for alleged rape.

Shahnawaz Hussain has denied the allegations.

A magisterial courtroom had on July 7, 2018 ordered the registration of an FIR in opposition to Shahnawaz Hussain, saying a cognisable offence was made out within the criticism.

This was challenged by the BJP chief earlier than a periods courtroom which had dismissed his plea.

In its order, the excessive courtroom had mentioned, “There is no merit in the present petition. The petition is dismissed. The interim orders stand vacated. The FIR be registered forthwith. The investigations will be completed and a detailed report under Section 173 CrPC be submitted before the learned MM (metropolitan magistrate) within three months.”

The excessive courtroom had additionally mentioned that whereas reference is made within the police standing report back to the recording of the assertion of the prosecutrix on 4 events, there was no rationalization as to why the FIR was not lodged.

“The FIR only puts the machinery into operation. It is a foundation for the investigation of the offence complained of. It is only after investigations that the police can come to the conclusion whether or not an offence had been committed and if so by whom. In the present case, there seems to be a complete reluctance on the part of the police to even register an FIR,” the excessive courtroom had mentioned.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV workers and is printed from a syndicated feed.)

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.